Registry analysis

Statistics

A readable analytical summary of the reviewed registry. This page prioritizes the patterns that explain the corpus; exhaustive machine-readable records remain available separately.

Reviewed checkpoint
Canonical denominator
139 assets
Distinct growth checkpoints
17

Current checkpoint

Registry at a glance

Exact audited counts. These are inventory measures, not rankings, market-share estimates, or safety scores.

Stable assets
139

Canonical asset records

Organizations
122

Canonical organization records

Events
214

Material historical events

Evidence
615

Reviewed evidence records

Lifecycle

Where the registry stands now

Operating, constrained, historical non-failure, and failed records remain separate so closure is not confused with collapse.

Operating106

76.26% of canonical assets

Constrained16

11.51% of canonical assets

Historical Non Failure8

5.76% of canonical assets

Failed6

4.32% of canonical assets

Other3

2.16% of canonical assets

Active106 records76.26%
Restricted13 records9.35%
Collapsed6 records4.32%
Terminated3 records2.16%
Unknown3 records2.16%
Winding Down3 records2.16%
Inactive2 records1.44%
Migrated2 records1.44%
Rebranded1 records0.72%

Composition

What kinds of assets are recorded

Each panel is a separate classification dimension. Long tails are combined into “Other recorded values” instead of being dumped into an unreadable wall.

Asset class

Stablecoin126
90.65%
Stable Value Asset6
4.32%
Yield Bearing Stable Receipt4
2.88%
Tokenized Commodity2
1.44%
Experimental Stabilization Asset1
0.72%

Reference target

Fiat134
96.4%
Commodity2
1.44%
Index2
1.44%
Floating1
0.72%

Stabilization mechanism

Issuer Redemption68
48.92%
Hybrid23
16.55%
Overcollateralized Vault16
11.51%
Protocol Arbitrage9
6.47%
Unknown7
5.04%
Other recorded values16
11.5%

Governance model

Centralized75
53.96%
DAO Governed27
19.42%
Protocol Governed26
18.71%
Hybrid6
4.32%
Protocol5
3.6%

Backing type

Cash39
28.06%
Mixed38
27.34%
Stablecoin Collateral32
23.02%
Crypto Collateral31
22.3%
Bank Deposits25
17.99%
Other recorded values79
56.8%

Fiat reference currency

USD99
73.88%
EUR14
10.45%
JPY4
2.99%
CHF2
1.49%
GBP2
1.49%
Other recorded values13
9.8%

Legal classification

Protocol Asset45
32.37%
Fiat Backed Stablecoin41
29.5%
Unclassified36
25.9%
E Money Token15
10.79%
Fund Share1
0.72%
Other recorded values2
1.4%

Historical activity

Events and failure patterns

The page shows the recent historical shape and leading categories rather than hundreds of individual event rows.

Events by year

20187
20195
202010
202120
202226
202319
202427
202530
202653
unknown17

Leading event types

Launch97
45.33%
Status Review12
5.61%
Protocol Upgrade7
3.27%
Protocol Model Update6
2.8%
Launched5
2.34%
Depeg4
1.87%
Migration4
1.87%
Other recorded values79
36.9%

Recorded event lifecycle

What happened after stress or policy change

These counts summarize reviewed canonical event records only. Missing event coverage means “not recorded in the canonical registry”, not proof that an event never occurred.

Depeg events
11
11 / 139 assets · 7.91%
Regulatory events
6
5 / 139 assets · 3.6%
Redemption changes
6
6 / 139 assets · 4.32%
Migration / termination
42
34 / 139 assets · 24.46%

Depeg recovery status

Collapsed: 3 (42.86%) · Not Recovered: 3 (42.86%) · Recovered: 1 (14.29%)

7 / 11 recorded depeg events have an explicit recovery-state value (63.64%).

Typed lifecycle-event kinds

Launch: 96 (44.86%) · Migration: 31 (14.49%) · Other: 31 (14.49%) · Governance Change: 12 (5.61%) · Security Incident: 8 (3.74%) · Termination: 8 (3.74%) · Depeg: 7 (3.27%) · Reserve Change: 7 (3.27%) · Other recorded values: 14 (6.5%)

Canonical failed assets6
Leading stabilization mechanismAlgorithmic Supply4 records · 66.67%
Leading backing typeUnbacked4 records · 66.67%
Leading governance modelProtocol Governed6 records · 100%
Most common collapse yearUnknown5 records · 83.33%

Network and institutions

Where assets are deployed and who supports them

Chain rows count deployments; organization rows count recorded relationships. Neither is a market-share measure.

Total deployments
201
Assets with deployments
133
Freeze capability known
1
Blacklist capability known
1

Top deployment chains

Ethereum92 assets
94
Solana18 assets
19
Base9 assets
9
Polygon9 assets
9
BNB Chain7 assets
7
Arbitrum One3 assets
3
TRON2 assets
3
XRP Ledger3 assets
3
Canton Network2 assets
2
Cardano2 assets
2

Leading organization roles

Legal issuer71 relationships51 organizations · 70 assets
Protocol operator67 relationships59 organizations · 67 assets
Brand owner6 relationships6 organizations · 6 assets
Technology provider3 relationships3 organizations · 3 assets
Reserve manager2 relationships2 organizations · 2 assets
Custodian1 relationships1 organizations · 1 assets
Other1 relationships1 organizations · 1 assets

Data quality

Coverage, evidence depth, and freshness

These figures measure registry completeness and review recency. They do not rate the safety or transparency of an asset.

Coverage

Classification139 / 139
100%
Legal Profile139 / 139
100%
Reserve Component139 / 139
100%
Reserve Redemption Profile139 / 139
100%
Deployment133 / 139
95.68%
Archive Evidence501 / 615
81.46%
Stable Asset Relationship8 / 139
5.76%

Evidence profile

Average evidence per asset
4.37
Median evidence per asset
4
Known unknowns
376
Typed event coverage
214 / 214

Evidence depth

2 4
60
5 Plus
60
1
19

Verification recency

31 90 Days
117
0 30 Days
22

Growth

How the reviewed corpus changed

Repeated checkpoints with identical totals are removed here. The remaining rows show material inventory changes, not market performance.

Assets added
+20
Events added
+23
Evidence added
+87
Assets112
Events187
Evidence557
Assets112
Events187
Evidence559
Assets114
Events189
Evidence565
Assets116
Events191
Evidence571
Assets117
Events192
Evidence579
Assets119
Events194
Evidence584
Assets119
Events194
Evidence585
Assets120
Events195
Evidence589